Guest Post by Kirthi Jayakumar
Editor's Note: As the 63rd session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (#CSW63), the
UN’s largest gathering on gender equality (#SDG5),takes place at UNHQ, New York, from 11 – 22 March 2019, Kirthi writes about how the Gender Equal utopia of Wakanda immortalized in Black Panther is an ideal that needs to be worked towards as a truly gender equal world can make life better for all.
*
Watching Black Panther twice made me see
something in Wakanda that we are missing out in the world around us, that we
can certainly strive to create. No, I don’t mean vibranium. And no, I don’t
mean the Dora Milaje (although I wish…). What I do mean I mean, is the status
of women.
Think about it: in Wakanda, gender equality
is a fact that breathes and lives among the community. In Wakanda, women are
badass and are not restrained from attaining their full potential. In Wakanda,
women are respected. But most importantly, in Wakanda, women are not burdened
with having to be culture signifiers. And yet, their cultural diversity is
respected, engaged with and revered.
In sharp
contrast, many communities in the real world, continue to essentialize culture,[1]
and focus on ways to keep culture a homogenous standard against which they hold
their women accountable. In doing so, there has been a poor focus on the
subordination of women and its social, economic and political connotations –
coupled with the construction of culture within the confines of power-relations
at all levels – local, national, regional and global.[2]
Studies have shown that the cultural practices that are upheld, highlighted and
celebrated across many of the world’s communities in countries that were once
colonies, are largely those that were selected, promoted as generally
applicable and privileged, by the colonial powers themselves. Consequently, a
lot of the male leaderships in traditional spaces have tended to derive their
authority and legitimacy from colonial power.[3]
As a result, formalized legislative and policy frameworks tend towards cultural
interpretations, and state institutions continue to define culture – subtly or
otherwise.[4]
That women’s bodies are the primary
vehicles of reproduction has been a basis for the confinement of their roles to
being reproducers, or those that are tasked with reproducing the community. That
women’s bodies are also primary vehicles to signify and embody culture has been
a basis for the imposition of the task of reproducing the dominant culture of
their communities, on women.[5]
With the rigid gender roles, then, there come rigid structures, patriarchal
norms and policing systems that police a woman’s body, identity, choices and
movement. The norms that are assigned through unequal gender roles continue to manifest
are cyclically perpetuated. As a consequence of being considered the
“privileged signifiers” of cultural factors that differentiate communities,[6]
women are forced to conform with the status quo. This conformity is equated
with the larger goal of preservation of culture – and any attempt to challenge
an existing norm is seen as a betrayal of culture – and the sanctions are
painful. Women are likely to be bound by tradition when it comes to marriage,
child birth and seeking employment, even if they may have access to education,
and healthcare. Furthermore, some cultural and traditional practices that
granted women rights – such as matrilineal ancestral descent, right to property
and right to land – may be discarded, or weakened with the progressive
weakening of personal agency.[7]
This form of structural violence leads to
women facing a range of discriminatory treatment and violence. Everything from
social restrictions and stigma, to honour-based crimes and other forms of
violence and discrimination, keep the cycle of violence against women alive. In
some instances, the imposition of the status of cultural signifiers takes
precedence even over the rigid sex-specific role of reproduction. For instance,
in India, a recent policy framework exempted cosmetic products used as cultural
signifiers of Hinduism from tax, but levied a heavy tax on menstrual products.
In sharp contrast, Wakanda is very
different. Representing culture is not a gender role – and there are no gender
roles, either. Everyone is free to live and work to their full potential. For
instance, Nakia rejected taking the herb and becoming the Black Panther only
because she didn’t have an army and the herb was a good incentive to win the
Jabari tribe over, not because it was meant only for men. Nakia also gets to travel
the world and work without having to be a cultural signifier. Shuri was a woman
in STEM, working to build and improve technology like a pro – she was not kept
out of science like women in our world are. Okoye is a General, and the Dora
Milaje are the forefront in Wakanda’s military space – not kept out of the army
because it’s a traditionally male job. After Zuri is killed, a woman takes over
position – not that his job is confined only to men.
The key lesson to take home from Wakanda is
that when culture and tradition bind certain aspects of women’s social lives,
women may remain bound by these norms for long after other aspects of their
socio-economic and political lives may have changed.
We see it in the world around us. And we
need to change it.
[1] Farida Shaheed, “Citizenship and the Nuanced Belonging of Women”,
in Scratching the Surface: Democracy, Traditions, Gender, Jennifer Bennett, ed.
(Lahore, Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2007).
[2] A/HRC/4/34, para. 20
[3] Charu Gupta, Sexuality, Obscenity, Community: Women, Muslims, and
the Hindu Public in Colonial India (Delhi, Permanent Black, 2001).
[4] Charu Gupta, Sexuality, Obscenity, Community: Women, Muslims, and
the Hindu Public in Colonial India (Delhi, Permanent Black, 2001).
[5] Nira Yuval-Davis, “The Bearers of the Collective: Women and
Religious Legislation in Israel”, Feminist Review, vol. 4 (1980), pp. 15-27.
[6] Deniz Kandiyoti, “Identity and its Discontents: Women and the
Nation”, Millennium — Journal of International Studies, vol. 20, No. 3 (March
1991), pp. 429-443.
[7] Uma Narayan, “Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist
Critique of Cultural Essentialism”, Hypatia, vol. 13, No. 2 (Spring 1998)
Contributor Bio
Kirthi Jayakumar (Founder/Chief Executive Officer of The Red Elephant Foundation) is
from Chennai, India. She is the recipient of the US Presidential
Services Medal (2012) for her services as a volunteer to Delta Women
NGO, from President Barack Obama. She is the two-time recipient of the
UN Online Volunteer of the Year Award (2012, 2013). Her work has been
published in The Guardian and the TIME Magazine. She was recognized by
EuropeAid on the "200 Women in the World of Development Wall of Fame in
2016." She received the Digital Women Award for Social Impact in 2017,
from SheThePeople, Person of the Year Award, 2017 (Brew Magazine) and
the Yuva Samman in 2018 (MOP Vaishnav College).
Nice article, thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteLOVELY BLOG... i have learn many more.
ReplyDelete........................................
Solar Insect Killer